Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printed version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

TM  9-2320-356-BD 2-5.  ASSESSMENT  PROCESS a.   Assessments   of   damage   may   be   made   in   turn   by   operator/crew,   MT,   and   MST personnel. The   assessment   procedures   are   as   follows: ( 1 )     I n s p e c t. (2)    Functionally    test. (3)   Assess   the   performance. b. There   are   three   kinds   of   assessments   performed   on   damaged   equipment: (1)   The   first   is   assessment   of   the   extent   and   kind   of   damage   and   how   it affects   vehicle   operation   and   capabilities. (2)   The   second   is   assessment   of   whether   the   damage   needs   to   be   repaired. (3)   The   third   is   assessment   of   where   and   how   to   repair   the   damage. 2-6. OVERALL  VEHICLE  ASSESSMENT  PROCEDURE a. This   procedure   can   be   used   by   the   crew,    but   it   will   be   of   more   use   to   an   MT   or MST   assessor   working   to   quick-fix   vehicles   for   the   completion   of   a   mission   or   self- recovery. The   procedure   provides   for   assessing   the   kind   of   damage   and   determining: (   1   )   the   effect   of   the   damage   and   if   it   needs   to   be   fixed, (2)   if   the   damage   can   be   fixed   using   BDAR   or   if   only   regular   maintenance operation   can   fix   it,   and (3)     how     long     it     will     take     to     fix     it. b. This   is   accomplished   by   structuring   this   manual   in   rank   order,   from   the vehicle   two-function   overview   down   to   the   specific. Each   major   function   (move   and communicate)   and   each   subsystem   of   that   function   has   a   stand-alone   assessment procedure. This   makes   it   easier   to   identify   each   significant   problem   encountered   in battlefield    damaged    equipment. c. As   an   example,   presume   a   2-l/2-ton   truck   is   down   with   a   bad   fuel   pump.   Fuel pumps   are   essential   for   even   the   lowest   level   of   limp-home   self-recovery.   The vehicle/system   assessment   table,   as   part   of   its   engine   evaluation,   tells   the   reader to   visually   and   functionally   check   the   engine. If   it   doesn’t   work,   the   assessor   can then   visually   and   functionally   check   the   engine   subsystems   if   time   permits.   The assessor   would   visually   and   functionally   check   the   fuel   subsystem   and   discover   that the   pump   was   inoperative. The   fuel   subsystem   assessment   table   directs   the   reader   to a   specific   page   where   BDAR   suggestions   for   alternate   fuel   supply   systems   can   be considered   for   use. d. At   any   point   on   each   of   the   assessment   levels,   the   assessor   can   abort   the procedure   and   direct   recovery,   evacuation,    or   other   actions   if   the   tactical   situation dictates. e. Refer   to   chart   2-1   to   begin   the   assessment   process. 2-4

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business